iraf and Linux RHEL 4 / Fedora 4 (fwd)
Guest wrote on Oct 26, 2005
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:06:35 +0200
From: Enrico V. Held <held@pd.astro.it>
To: Mike Fitzpatrick <fitz@tucana.tuc.noao.edu>
Cc: Enrico V. Held <held@pd.astro.it>
Subject: Re: iraf and Linux RHEL 4 / Fedora 4
Hi Mike,
thanks a lot for you answer. This help very much.
> The latest IRAF V2.12.2a version is known to work under FC4/RHEL
> so the first thing is to be sure you're not using an old version. The
> prebuilt binaries may indeed be a problem but you didn't say what package
> these were for or exactly what errors you're getting.
We will do more tests and write down an analytic error report.
But before that, we will re-install IRAF from the latest binaries
available on the IRAF web site. I have checked our installation
and it turns out to be V12.2.2-EXPORT of Jan. 25, 2004.
> directory). Before you try this though, let me know if the V2.12.2a
> system still doesn't work, whether this is a 64-bit system, and exactly
> what error messages you're getting. It is not likely that simply
Our machines are 2CPU with Xeon EMT64, purchased this year.
I do not know if these can be regarded as real "64 bit" systems.
Thank you very much for now-
regards,
Enrico
Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:06:35 +0200
From: Enrico V. Held <held@pd.astro.it>
To: Mike Fitzpatrick <fitz@tucana.tuc.noao.edu>
Cc: Enrico V. Held <held@pd.astro.it>
Subject: Re: iraf and Linux RHEL 4 / Fedora 4
Hi Mike,
thanks a lot for you answer. This help very much.
> The latest IRAF V2.12.2a version is known to work under FC4/RHEL
> so the first thing is to be sure you're not using an old version. The
> prebuilt binaries may indeed be a problem but you didn't say what package
> these were for or exactly what errors you're getting.
We will do more tests and write down an analytic error report.
But before that, we will re-install IRAF from the latest binaries
available on the IRAF web site. I have checked our installation
and it turns out to be V12.2.2-EXPORT of Jan. 25, 2004.
> directory). Before you try this though, let me know if the V2.12.2a
> system still doesn't work, whether this is a 64-bit system, and exactly
> what error messages you're getting. It is not likely that simply
Our machines are 2CPU with Xeon EMT64, purchased this year.
I do not know if these can be regarded as real "64 bit" systems.
Thank you very much for now-
regards,
Enrico
Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)
Last post on Oct 26, 2005