EVAL and INVERTFIT
Robert Janusz wrote on Dec 07, 2009
I have a catalog (vzcat):
and observation data (vzdat):
The results of the FITPAR
in two cases gives the correct results, for EVAL as well:
When I change the vzcat:
the result for EVAL is
When I cange the catalog and data for:
Why are there these "INDEF" in the INVERT outputs?
rj
PS
When I change the catalog and run again,
the result for INVERT is correct:
1 1and observation data (vzdat):
1 1.1
and both the config files (vzcfge, vzcfgi):# for EVAL
catalog
V 2
observation
v 2
transformation
fit c=0.
FIT: V = v + c
# for INVERT
catalog
V 2
observation
v 2
transformation
fit c=0.
FIT: v = V + c
.The results of the FITPAR
del vzpare,vzoute
fitpar vzdat vzcat vzcfge vzpare
eval vzdat vzcfge vzpare vzoute catal=vzcat
del vzpari,vzouti
fitpar vzdat vzcat vzcfgi vzpari
invert vzdat vzcfgi vzpari vzouti catal=vzcat
in two cases gives the correct results, for EVAL as well:
1 1.000 INDEF 0.000
but NOT for INVERT:1 INDEF INDEF INDEF.When I change the vzcat:
1 1
2 2the result for EVAL is
1 1.000 INDEF 0.000
and for INVERT is 1 1.000 INDEF 0.000
, as it should be but the catalog data "2" does not play any role here.When I cange the catalog and data for:
1 1
2 2and1 1.1
2 2the results for EVALFIT and INVERT are 1 1.050 INDEF -0.050
2 1.950 INDEF 0.050
and1 1.050 INDEF -0.050
2 1.950 INDEF 0.050
.But for the catalog and data1 1
2 2
3 31 1
2 2
3 3the results are: for EVAL:1 1.000 INDEF 0.000
2 2.000 INDEF 0.000
3 3.000 INDEF 0.000
for INVERT1 1.000 INDEF 0.000
2 INDEF INDEF INDEF
3 3.000 INDEF 0.000
.Why are there these "INDEF" in the INVERT outputs?
rj
PS
When I change the catalog and run again,
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4the result for INVERT is correct:
1 1.000 INDEF 0.000
2 2.000 INDEF 0.000
3 3.000 INDEF 0.000
Last post on Dec 07, 2009